Faroidh is the science governing the division of inheritance in Islam. Basic of these is a letter An-Nisaa verse 11 to 14 in which the threat to people who do not use the law in dividing Faroidh heritage is threatened with punishment.
The division according to the law Faroidh after the estate will be reduced by (if any) that the maximum amount of 1 / 3 of the total estate to be distributed. Yulianto Great work program has been a lot of uploads in various file sharing services, one of whom was MediaFire.com
But Umam Khotibul opinion there are some calculation errors among others:
FIRST
The heirs are:
1. Siblings
2. Sibling sisters
3. Husband
4. 2 brothers has left
5. Mother
In parts of the program are described:
1. Brothers and sisters get ashobah bilghoir venter (right).
2. Husband got 1 / 2 (right),
3. 2 brothers has left a 1 / 3 (right),
4. Mom got 1 / 3 (kalalah)
In a written statement:
Ashobah are those who get the remaining estate after Ashhabul Furudh take the parts assigned to them.
Bilghoir is Ashobah man with a woman in the ratio of 2:1.
Mother got a 1 / 3, because there is no Son / Grandson / two brothers.
Husband got ½, because there are no children or grandchildren.
Mr female sibling is' Ashobah bilghoir, alongside his sibling Men
Mister man venter is' Ashobah bilghoir, along with sibling sisters.
Two Brothers has left a 1 / 3 (kalalah).
Kalalah means no heirs from the Usul (father, grandfather and so on.) Of the party men and no heirs of the Furu '(children, grandchildren and so on.) Both the male and female alike. (Optional)
Note:
1. Location of fault on the mother 1 / 3, whereas in the written statement of capital is 1 / 3, because there is no Son / Grandson / two brothers (both siblings, half or has left, either from one class instance of 2 siblings or from 2 different sample groups of siblings 1 and 1 from sudara has left, both are counted as 2 people). While there was a brother has left 2 people. Should the mother is 1 / 6, because there are 2 people from his brother has left.
2. If problems in the division is correct, the counting does not stop there alone. Since the first issue is the problem Hijariah. There is a separate discussion.
SECOND
The heirs are:
1. Husband
2. Mother
3. Grandfather
4. Sibling sisters
In parts of the program are described:
1. Husband got 1 / 2 (right)
2. Mom got 1 / 3 (right)
3. Grandpa got ashobah binnafsi (?)
4. Sibling sisters get ashobah bilghoir (wrong)
In a written statement:
Ashobah are those who have remaining estate after Ashhabul Furudh take the parts assigned to them.
Binnafsi is all nasabnya man with the dead is not interrupted by a woman, got the rest of the property.
Mother got a 1 / 3, because there is no Son / Grandson / two brothers.
Husband got a 1 / 2, because there are no Children or Grandchildren.
Grandfather was Ashobah Binnafsi, because there is no Father and Son / Grandson man.
Mr female sibling is' Ashobah bilghoir, with man venter.
Note:
1. Location of error:
First: In the sibling sister get ashobah bilghoir, when information is written in the Miss pr. Venter: 'Ashobah bilghoir, with man venter. While the two problems above do not have brothers participating siblings was heir.
Second: In the above calculation grandfather get ashobah part binnafsi the grounds because there is no Father and Son / Grandson man. If there Grandfather's position as a substitute for the father's position female sibling sister did not get heritage, because mahjub (closed / block) by his grandfather. This opinion Shohabah opinion berdarkan headed by Abu Bakr and Abu Hanifa.
But if the thought that Grandpa was not memahjubkan (cover / block) as sibling sisters Shohabah opinion of Ali Ibn Abi Talib ra, Zaid ibn Thabit, Abdullah ibn Mas'ud and Mazahibul arba'ah except Abu Hanifah, may be a sibling sisters still get the inheritance musyarokah system-no separate discussion, with my grandfather.
2. If problems in the division is correct, the counting does not stop there alone. Because the second problem is the problem Akdariah. There is a separate discussion.
Source: Khotibul Umam
The division according to the law Faroidh after the estate will be reduced by (if any) that the maximum amount of 1 / 3 of the total estate to be distributed. Yulianto Great work program has been a lot of uploads in various file sharing services, one of whom was MediaFire.com
But Umam Khotibul opinion there are some calculation errors among others:
FIRST
The heirs are:
1. Siblings
2. Sibling sisters
3. Husband
4. 2 brothers has left
5. Mother
In parts of the program are described:
1. Brothers and sisters get ashobah bilghoir venter (right).
2. Husband got 1 / 2 (right),
3. 2 brothers has left a 1 / 3 (right),
4. Mom got 1 / 3 (kalalah)
In a written statement:
Ashobah are those who get the remaining estate after Ashhabul Furudh take the parts assigned to them.
Bilghoir is Ashobah man with a woman in the ratio of 2:1.
Mother got a 1 / 3, because there is no Son / Grandson / two brothers.
Husband got ½, because there are no children or grandchildren.
Mr female sibling is' Ashobah bilghoir, alongside his sibling Men
Mister man venter is' Ashobah bilghoir, along with sibling sisters.
Two Brothers has left a 1 / 3 (kalalah).
Kalalah means no heirs from the Usul (father, grandfather and so on.) Of the party men and no heirs of the Furu '(children, grandchildren and so on.) Both the male and female alike. (Optional)
Note:
1. Location of fault on the mother 1 / 3, whereas in the written statement of capital is 1 / 3, because there is no Son / Grandson / two brothers (both siblings, half or has left, either from one class instance of 2 siblings or from 2 different sample groups of siblings 1 and 1 from sudara has left, both are counted as 2 people). While there was a brother has left 2 people. Should the mother is 1 / 6, because there are 2 people from his brother has left.
2. If problems in the division is correct, the counting does not stop there alone. Since the first issue is the problem Hijariah. There is a separate discussion.
SECOND
The heirs are:
1. Husband
2. Mother
3. Grandfather
4. Sibling sisters
In parts of the program are described:
1. Husband got 1 / 2 (right)
2. Mom got 1 / 3 (right)
3. Grandpa got ashobah binnafsi (?)
4. Sibling sisters get ashobah bilghoir (wrong)
In a written statement:
Ashobah are those who have remaining estate after Ashhabul Furudh take the parts assigned to them.
Binnafsi is all nasabnya man with the dead is not interrupted by a woman, got the rest of the property.
Mother got a 1 / 3, because there is no Son / Grandson / two brothers.
Husband got a 1 / 2, because there are no Children or Grandchildren.
Grandfather was Ashobah Binnafsi, because there is no Father and Son / Grandson man.
Mr female sibling is' Ashobah bilghoir, with man venter.
Note:
1. Location of error:
First: In the sibling sister get ashobah bilghoir, when information is written in the Miss pr. Venter: 'Ashobah bilghoir, with man venter. While the two problems above do not have brothers participating siblings was heir.
Second: In the above calculation grandfather get ashobah part binnafsi the grounds because there is no Father and Son / Grandson man. If there Grandfather's position as a substitute for the father's position female sibling sister did not get heritage, because mahjub (closed / block) by his grandfather. This opinion Shohabah opinion berdarkan headed by Abu Bakr and Abu Hanifa.
But if the thought that Grandpa was not memahjubkan (cover / block) as sibling sisters Shohabah opinion of Ali Ibn Abi Talib ra, Zaid ibn Thabit, Abdullah ibn Mas'ud and Mazahibul arba'ah except Abu Hanifah, may be a sibling sisters still get the inheritance musyarokah system-no separate discussion, with my grandfather.
2. If problems in the division is correct, the counting does not stop there alone. Because the second problem is the problem Akdariah. There is a separate discussion.
Source: Khotibul Umam
No comments:
Post a Comment